![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Australia in Depth Article
#111
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| 2nd Wmk Deep dull green | 3rd Wmk Indigo-violet | CofA Wmk Dark grey and aniline pink |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Salmon-eosin | Single Wmk Deep turquoise | Lemon-yellow with the ‘line through value’ variety |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Large Multiple Wmk Cooke Deep red |
Ham first printing 1d Orange-vermilion |
Deep dull blue |
However, there are a number of other shade variations that are generally not yet recognised for what they are by the market. I believe that the interest in items such as these and other significant shade variations will grow in importance in the future. Each of the shades in the second group of scans below are not yet listed separately as such in the ACSC, yet they are significantly different from the listed shades to justify either a separate shade listing, or at least a special mention in a footnote. To a shade specialist they are of great interest.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| On the 2nd Wmk 2/- thin paper the shade is always a very light brown |
3rd Wmk 2/- an extreme example of the intense deep brown – could be named black-brown |
3rd Wmk 10/- Grey and intense aniline pink – the extreme examples are a stunning shade |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| 3rd Wmk £1 Light
brown and pale dull blue |
Single wmk 2d deep intense red – only seen perf ‘OS’ |
No Wmk error in the deep golden-scarlet shade |
The 3rd watermark 2/- illustrated above is a truly spectacular shade, of which I have only seen the one example. Unfortunately the illustration does not show the full depth of this stamp’s colour. In real life it has to be seen to be believed, with an appearance that would justify being called black-brown.
It is interesting to note that some of these extreme shade variations have only been seen in conjunction with another variety, in most cases rare in their own right. In such instances, it is reasonable to assume that most of the corresponding portion of the printing were rejected by the printer for issue and subsequently destroyed. The £1 light brown and pale dull blue above being a case in point. The few examples of this shade seen all show a dry ink variety in conjunction with the double print of the frame plate, one albino. The ACSC states that at least two of these exist; the current count is about four. I have seen all of these and they are in the same shade and centred the same, giving rise to the possibility that only one sheet may have been issued.
The single watermark 2d deep intense red is a stunning shade, of which I have only seen four examples, all mint, with the same centring and perf ‘OS’. Once again, this gives good reason to believe that only one sheet may have been issued. For the no watermark error in the 2d, I am aware of only one example in the deep golden-scarlet shade. During the last thirty years I have seen approximately forty examples of this error and with this exception, all are stamps that would fall within the normal range of the golden-scarlet shade.
In most of the above cases, and there are others, it is reasonable to assume that more were printed and that they were rejected for issue as they varied too much from what was accepted for issue; resulting in their destruction. If they are given separate listings in future editions of the ACSC their status will only rise, as I anticipate the interest in shades will generally.
In Part 2 of this article, to be printed in the September edition of Stamp News, I will have a more detailed examination of some of the issues and difficulties that arise in determining the shades of stamps, and also provide some direct comparisons of the variations in price that different shades can make, including some of those referred to above.

Simon Dunkerley Pty Ltd
P. O. Box 461 Blackburn Victoria 3130 AUSTRALIA
Tel: (61 3) 9878 1142 Mob: 0419 872 951
Email us at simon@simondunkerley.com